Birthright Citizenship & the 14th Amendment

The challenge

What's the Challenge?

On his first day back in office in January 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to refuse U.S. citizenship documents to children born in the United States if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order challenges more than a century of settled constitutional interpretation: the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause—'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States'—has been understood since United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) to extend citizenship to nearly all children born on U.S. soil. The executive order has been blocked in part or in whole by multiple federal courts. The Supreme Court has been asked to weigh in. At stake: whether birthright citizenship can be narrowed by executive action, whether 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' excludes children of unauthorized immigrants, and what the policy consequences would be either way.

Where we agree

Where Most Americans Agree

The Constitution, including the 14th Amendment, should be respected
Major changes to constitutional interpretation deserve serious legal and democratic deliberation
Citizenship is a profound legal status that shouldn't be left in administrative limbo for children
The U.S. immigration system needs comprehensive reform
Federal courts have a legitimate role in deciding constitutional questions
Whatever the rule, it should be applied predictably and fairly

Source · Pew Research Center, Gallup 2024-2025

Both sides, fairly

How each side argues it.

Understanding the full debate means reading what each side actually says, not the caricature of it.

Progressive

Progressive Perspective

The text of the 14th Amendment is clear: nearly all children born on U.S. soil are citizens at birth, full stop
Wong Kim Ark settled this question in 1898 and has been relied on by generations of Americans, courts, and federal agencies
Ending birthright citizenship would create a permanent underclass of U.S.-born children with no country—a recipe for civil rights crisis
Constitutional amendments require the amendment process; an executive order cannot override the 14th Amendment
The change would force every American to prove their parents' immigration status at birth, fundamentally altering how citizenship works
Most peer comparison countries do extend citizenship at birth, especially in the Americas; the U.S. is in good company, not an outlier

Conservative

Conservative Perspective

The 14th Amendment was written to confer citizenship on freed slaves; extending it to children of unauthorized immigrants distorts the framers' intent
The phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' was meant to exclude people who owe primary allegiance elsewhere—originally Native Americans and foreign diplomats, but arguably others
Most developed countries in Europe and Asia do not grant automatic citizenship by birth on their soil
Birthright citizenship creates a powerful incentive for unauthorized immigration and 'birth tourism'
The Supreme Court hasn't squarely ruled on the children of unauthorized immigrants since the 14th Amendment was ratified—this is a legitimate question to revisit
Settling the question through litigation is appropriate even if the courts ultimately reject the executive order

The evidence

Evidence-Based Facts

№ 01
The 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause reads: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.'
Source · U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV
№ 02
In United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), the Supreme Court held that a child born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents was a U.S. citizen at birth
Source · Supreme Court of the United States; Congressional Research Service
№ 03
President Trump's January 2025 executive order directing agencies not to recognize birthright citizenship for certain children has been blocked in whole or in part by multiple federal district and appellate courts; cases are proceeding to the Supreme Court
Source · Federal court rulings; CRS legal analysis
№ 04
Of major developed countries, the United States and Canada grant unconditional birthright citizenship; most European and Asian nations do not
Source · Library of Congress comparative law research
№ 05
Estimates of the number of children born annually in the U.S. to at least one unauthorized parent are around 250,000-300,000—about 6-7% of all U.S. births in recent years
Source · Pew Research Center analysis of Census data

Read deeper

Learn More

Honest questions

Questions for Thoughtful Debate

№ 01
Can the president change the meaning of the 14th Amendment by executive order?
№ 02
Does 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' exclude children of unauthorized immigrants?
№ 03
What policy effects—on incentives, on a potential stateless underclass—would follow either outcome?
№ 04
If the U.S. wanted to change the rule, would that require a constitutional amendment?
№ 05
How should U.S. practice compare to peer democracies on this question?
№ 06
How should the courts balance long-standing precedent against new constitutional arguments?